Does winning rings determine being a better player?

In the game today a lot of fans, and analysts try to judge the greatness of a player or if they're at certain level based on if their winning rings, or have won a ring. Some Hall of Fame players, some of the best don't have a ring. For example two Hall of Famers Charles Barkely, and Karl Malone didn't win a ring but still considered great in a lot of eyes. People would say that Michael Jordan is the greatest player to play the game. Now thats said for a reason. He dominated in every part of the game. From numerous most valuable player awards, to deffensive player awards, to all teams deffense and offense. To leading his team to 2 different 3 peats, winning 6 nba titles. He proved his leading of the NBA titles by winning the finals MVP several times also. Now with every player comes a teams so he wouldn't have made it without the team, but also the team would be nowhere without his game winning shots, clutch play and eye popping plays.

    So today the talks seems to be that Kobe Bryant 4 time NBA champion, is the best player. Theres alot of big names that have reason to feel otherwise. Now best player in my opinion, is either LeBron James or Dwayne Wade. I believe without the best player the team would be nothing. The Los Angeles Lakers, the team Kobe Bryant plays for, is a good TEAM! Now some confuse that with being the best player. I think the best player player has the best stats, and their team couldn't win without. Its been proven that the teams, that Lebron James, and Dwayne Wade play for can't function without them. So i'm saying the best PLAYER, is the most valuabe to their team, and has the best statistics. Not how many rings you win, although that is important. So in closing D-Wade or LeBron is the best as of now!!!!!!!!!!!!!